Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish Jazz Recordings and Beyond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Polish Jazz Recordings and Beyond

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (books) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Theshinzu (creator) with no rationale. While the article sports an impressive collection of refs, they seem to be misleading. For starters, it's a recent book (2015), and virtually all refs are older, so what is it that they are suppose to be proving? As far as I can tell, they are references to other works on Polish jazz and such, irrelevant here. Outside a quote from the book jacket, there is no links to any reliable reviews, nor can I find any. Not all books are notable, and this one doesn't seem to be notable (at least, not yet). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * * WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Does not establish notability.Pincrete (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: As the nominator observes, most of the given references relate to the subject area in general (for example linking to books about Komeda and Stańko) rather than this 2015 book in particular. In years to come this may well become a standard reference book in its field, but that is speculation. As things stand, this fails the WP:NBOOK criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.