Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim to any notability. Fails WP:NORG. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * As a governmental agency in Poland NAWA has relevant programs for international community. Some links were added to the article to confirm its notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Algirdas2018 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting per request. The AfD has been open for a full 7 days.
 * Comment - I'd like to request relisting to allow further time to look for sources. Daask (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 21:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Pinging again. If you don't plan to comment back with a conclusion you might want to comment as much. :)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 03:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Improvements by and  since nomination demonstrate coverage in independent, RS that meets minimum level of WP:SIGCOV (assuming my interpretations of the Polish sources are at least in the ballpark). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. The subject has been the primary subject of multiple news articles. I believe I have substantially improved the content and sources of the article since it was first nominated. Daask (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I think my earlier remark was careless. On second look, I see only two in-depth news articles which are fully independent, and ; I hadn't realized that Science in Poland was a state-sponsored publication. Still, there are several journal articles focused on the organization, specifically  and . Daask (talk) 21:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.