Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish parliamentary election, 2015


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy on request. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 07:05, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Polish parliamentary election, 2015

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:CRYSTALBALL.--Müdigkeit (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC) Müdigkeit (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Content largely off-topic (the 2011 election); the only reference to the 2015 election is, as nom mentions, a WP:CRYSTALBALL reference. No inline citations, and even adding them is not helpful, since there is no notability or enough content for an article. Churn and change (talk) 03:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * This article is mistitled because the next election could take place before 2015, but, if we have any verifiable information, there is no reason not to have an article on the next Polish parliamentary election under the terms of WP:CRYSTALBALL note 1, as we routinely do. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:19, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If enough material exists, yes an article would work. We have an article on the US elections for 2012 and  2014. If not, as is the case here from the complete lack of sources, it won't. We don't have an article on US elections for 2016 (except for the Senate in 2016). Note that this applies to the gubernatorial elections too, and isn't hence a function of the two-year term of the US congress. It is just that the year 2016 is a bit too far out. If that holds for the US elections, I don't see Polish elections for 2015, affecting a smaller group, being more relevant. The article can be recreated closer to election time. Churn and change (talk) 19:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or userfy if requested, but now it is really too soon. -Cavarrone (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I am willing to support keeping this IF a single ref about 2015 election is added to the article. Future elections can be notable, if they are discussed by sources. Just saying that an election will happen is not very useful, a note on a page like elections in Poland will suffice. (Ping me if there is a substantial development you'd like me to reconsider my current abstention). PS. I also think that we should consider AfDing Next Finnish parliamentary election and a number of other election pages suffering from similar no meaningful content from the elections in 2013+ categories. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't seem to be anything to say about this yet. The article is mainly about the previous election. If there is more substantial information that can be added, I'll change my vote. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per WP:CRYSTAL, the complete lack of references and the lack of an article in polish wiki. If references with in-depth coverage get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Userfy - seems premature. --Estlandia (Miacek) (dialogue) 12:27, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.