Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political Scandals that were exploited in American Media History


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Political Scandals that were exploited in American Media History

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

written as essay.. looks like college project just copy pasted... maybe copy write content... India1277 (talk) 18:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, clearly falls under WP:NOTESSAY. RA 0808  talkcontribs 18:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above. According to the creator's contribs, this was written for a class.  Jip Orlando (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given. Is there not a way to speedy it? Never been much of a deletionist and not sure what the form is. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is original research. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a speedy way to delete this type of article.  The article admits that it is an essay.  - Pmedema (talk) 23:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete I was thinking to rename this, but with AFD going I won't. I think there could be an article in media coverage of American political scandals.  But the current title is a point of view pushing title. The contents is an essay, trying to prove a point to an American reader. It contains plenty of personal opinion and persuasion. So there is nothing in the content worth preserving. I don't think we can speedy delete this as advertising.  But and AFD delete seems sure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This isn't an encyclopedia article, and can't be turned into one. Nick-D (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:ESSAY. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.