Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political Theology and Churches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Political Theology and Churches

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatant case of essay / original research. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, as essay, possibly a Speedy delete as duplicating Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim.TheLongTone (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, but also possibly speedy as copyvio ("Nonetheless, for the scope of this journal, the intention is certainly not to pester anyone with the definition of theological politics" doesn't sound like something written for Wikipedia) -- No  unique  names  17:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, per WP:NOTESSAY & WP:NOTSOAPBOX.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.