Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political movements in China and America during the Cold War


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Political movements in China and America during the Cold War

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I had previously PRODed this under another account I use for work - so disclosure there. This is ultimately a student essay that while well written as an essay, it's just not suitable as an encyclopedia article. The student removed the PROD, so I'm taking this to the next step in the process. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't seem like political movements in China AND American DURING the cold war is a research area (which would either be wider - e.g. political movements during the cold war or narrower to China or the US).Icewhiz (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - strange grouping of concepts, as far as I can see, this is not an area of research, but two separate areas. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as essay. Valid, referenced material and obviously a lot of work, but a poorly defined scope for an article and so not suitable.  --Lockley (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. See my comments on the article's talk page under Essay vs. article for more.  Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Background, analysis, conclusion - this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.