Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political privacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Secret ballot. Not a snowball's chance of another outcome. czar 20:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Political privacy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article started off as a self-confessed opinionative essay, and despite some of the worst writing being removed that is effectively what it remains. All of the article's content is covered far better in the specific articles on secret ballot, political demonstration, no-fly list and so forth. There is no evidence that lumping all of these things together produces a meaningful concept with any third-party usage. – Smyth\talk 12:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Secret ballot which is the main topic of the article. The other points are probably covered well in other articles on privacy, the right to privacy, etc.Borock (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Secret ballot per Borock.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect is fine, I suppose. This is a classic example of an (essentially) unsourced original essay and is deletable on those grounds. Carrite (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as nominator. – Smyth\talk 11:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 'Redirect per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.