Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics (Discord server)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It's WP:SNOWING brimstone on this one. Hog Farm Talk 21:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Hog Farm Talk 21:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Politics (Discord server)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 22:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it's like a page for subreddits. Discord is a very notable social medium and this server, while not as public as subreddits, has wikipedia worthy events. Also a random village in idk what country isn't notable either but still gets a wikipedia page. TheGroninger (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jurta talk 22:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:N or WP:WEB. The comment above appears to be a combination of WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:ITEXISTS, and WP:ITSNOTABLE. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject lacks notability.Athena-en (talk)08:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks notability.Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!)  09:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete A "Discord server" seems about as notable as your average subreddit, which is to say, not at all. KidAd  •  SPEAK  03:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SIGCOV. Mann Mann (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete – per nomination, the topic does not has notability in secondary reliable sources, failing WP:GNG – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.