Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Prince Edward Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. AfD is not meant for article imporvement or trimming. It is already sourced well. Bearian (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Politics of Prince Edward Island

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails to cite sources. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Of course it should be better sourced, but it's easy to get those sources; I added two in just a few minutes of editing. It's otherwise well written and looks like a bit of attention to more sourcing should keep it away from the grim reaper of deletionism. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 03:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. I'm one of those grim reapers, but this is a bit too much even for me. The nominator has not cited a valid reason for deletion. Provincial politics gets written about ad nauseum. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep and recommend the nominator reread WP:BEFORE. This is not a BLP issue, so unless the nominator thinks there aren't sources out there, deletion is an inappropriate course of action. --BDD (talk) 15:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Highly notable topic, simply needs improvement. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy/Snow Keep – Per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, rather than the state of sourcing within articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Summary of the politics of a Canadian province is clearly encyclopedic. No valid rationale for deletion provided. Carrite (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 01:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep but trim all un-referenced sections. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.