Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polka Floyd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The "delete" !voters have not addressed the sources provided on the talk page. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Polka Floyd

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable subject fails WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Peter Fleet (talk) 01:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Maybe mention them in the Pink Floyd article (that is, if they are even notable enough for that) but this page should not stay.-- The LegendarySky Attacker 01:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 01:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Chzz  ►  03:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete should have been a speedy delete. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability established by substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep For reasons stated by ChildofMidnight. In full disclosure, I created the page. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 15:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Allow me to add that the Google News link provided above by the person moving to delete the page does NOT return all news articles on the topic, such as those on the Polka Floyd talk page. Hopefully, Wikipedia is based on what's encyclopedic, not on what's cataloged in Google's database, especially since Google admits to cataloging only one eighth of the Internet. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 16:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve. Not a horrible start.  I tried to add an external link, but some character is messing it up.  Please help. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Think I fixed it. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 03:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I admit I am from their local area, but the band has regional notoriaty and has been the feature of several regional news articles - several are noted on the talk page for the article. I believe they qualify under the first and potentially the seventh guideline - they are well known and representative of the Toledo area as being noted by several independent sources. Jmslagle (talk) 00:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:MUSIC. Not even notable as a novelty. GripTheHusk (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete per all previous delete comments. Wether B (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.