Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pollution Check Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not a snowball's chance, polluted or not. Wikipedia is not where you write your school essay. Also note that the speedy should not have been declined; speedy tags cannot be removed by the article creator. The Bushranger One ping only 05:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Pollution Check Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable original research. PROD and Speedy both declined. GregJackP  Boomer!   11:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Zero notability, zero indication of wp:notability., zero real references. This isn't even an article or a real topic.  Looks like someone wrote up and idea of theirs for a class project and pasted some of the material in as a article. The "references" are just items by their school.  North8000 (talk) 11:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no encyclopedic content. Hairhorn (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. Mangoe (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.