Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pollution mask


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Respirator. Copyvio of www.articlesbase.com/wellness-articles/impact-of-air-pollution-dust-and-smoke-on-human-lungshealth-6546870.html (disallowed due to spam filter). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Pollution mask

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a fork of the Respirator article, and was created by a user blocked for advertising medical supplies. Article reads like a product description (available in grey color only). Trebonius (talk) 01:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge If the nominator doesn't like the way the article reads, then ordinary editing should be used per our editing policy. AFD is not cleanup.  Warden (talk) 10:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect to respirator. I'm not seeing anything that warrants a standalone article, but something might be worth merging. The title is a useful search term though and should be a blue link. Thryduulf (talk) 09:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge or Redirect to respirator. The article itself doesn't have enough information on the actual product to justify its independence (most of it appears to relate to pollution and its effects on human health, rather than the pollution mask), but the use of respirators to block pollutants from entering the airways seems like something that should probably be mentioned. Chri$topher (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.