Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polly Frame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Polly Frame

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason:it is innacurate and partially fictitious and Polly Frame herself has requested it to be removed. Please do so, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jambadger99 (talk • contribs)


 * Keep Completing nomination on behalf of above editor, who has no edits on that account other than applying the AfD tag and adding the above text to the article itself. As for my own view, subject is apparently notable as per the BBC reference in the current version on the article, but all info other than the Bunnytown role is unsourced.  She's accumulated a fair number of other TV and stage appearances since that show but doesn't appear to have generated many more articles about her specifically.  Article needs to be improved, but not deleted. -- Finngall   talk  16:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject is covered in reliable sources, thus somewhat notable however there are unsourced claims throughout the page. Meatsgains (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - We only follow BLPREQUEST if the person isn't notable .... In this case the person is notable and therefore should be kept and plus there's not actually a valid reason for deletion (Anyone can send a random article here and say "they requested it"). – Davey 2010 Talk 01:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.