Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polly Higgins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Polly Higgins

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of neutrality Amvros (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of neutrality isn't in itself a reason to delete, but combined with the lack of third-party coverage and a scarcity of coverage found on GNews there doesn't seem anything worth rescuing in this article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I found a few sources: see here, here and here, but I don't think they add up to much.  I found literally a single reliable source about this Polly Higgins -- she has a common name.  She fails my own notability guidelines for attorneys.  The article reads more like a resume of an up-and-coming activist than a lawyer.  Her work sounds fascinating, but unless someone can rescue this ugly mess of spam, the article needs to be incubated or deleted soon. Bearian (talk) 19:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.