Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polly O'Flynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Polly O'Flynn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist - this might look impressive at first glance, since her work appears to have been exhibited at the V&A and Royal College of Art, but on closer inspection both of those were as part of shows of student work, for a program that she was enrolled in as a student. This is not enough to confer notability per WP:ARTIST (which requires that their work be a "significant part of a substantial exhibition" - I very much doubt a student exhibition counts) and there's no evidence of the depth and breadth of coverage in independent reliable sources that would satisfy WP:GNG. Fyddlestix (talk) 03:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 03:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 03:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 03:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Has not had exhibitions on the level that would constitute notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. No significant critical attention, no exhibitions or monographs. Mduvekot (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.