Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polo (Video Game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Polo (Video Game)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable game. UltraMagnusspeak 11:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: totally unsourced. Alexius08 (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete While WP:V seems to be met, I can't even start to find anything that helps with WP:N. Hobit (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this video game. Joe Chill (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as spam. Edward321 (talk) 23:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This page was caught by a bot on 5 Oct so I'm surprised it's lasted this long. WP:N, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SPS would be a starting list of official policies that would need to be addressed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datheisen (talk • contribs) 07:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam, and non-notable due to a complete lack of reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.