Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polygamy in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. I'm closing this, since the nomination obviously no longer applies to the current version of the article. Mgm|(talk) 12:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Polygamy in India

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete while the topic may be encyclopedic, this beginning is not helpful in its creation. I think we should start it again, sourced, rather than starting with an unsourced extraordinary claim. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Since I'm such an obliging guy, I started it again for you, and this time with sources. Keep. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per above Lets  drink  Tea  22:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Current version is organized and sourced, thanks to LinguistAtLarge. Edward321 (talk) 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." from WP:ATD. If the page can be improved (and it has already been shown), then it shouldn't be deleted. Killiondude (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 06:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. You seriously wanted to delete "Polygamy in India"?!— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  08:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.