Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomf.se


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete under WP:CSD Mojo Hand (talk) 22:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Pomf.se

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have used the site occasionally (because of 4chan), but the site simply hasn't been the subject of enough significant, reliable coverage. Doesn't help that the article is borderline promotional. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete WP:NOTDIRECTORY and this fails WP:GNG as just not enough coverage. There isn;t much out there and tech companies are usually over-represented on the internet. --Gaff (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete As A7 which is what it was probably eligible for when it was nominated, and still is as far as I can tell. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.