Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pond (Australian band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) TBrandley (what's up) 03:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Pond (Australian band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Group fails WP:BAND. Refs are trivial, dead-links or facebook or self made. No evidence of any hits. Meets none of the notability requirements.  Velella  Velella Talk 17:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Besides the NME piece and the Allmusic review cited in the article, Metacritic lists several more reviews of the band's work. Subject meets WP:GNG and WP:BAND.  Gong   show  21:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily enough coverage exists to be considered notable by that route alone. --Michig (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Trivial keep - not a very good quality nomination at all - David Gerard (talk) 13:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:MUSIC criteria #1 and #4. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.