Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pond Creek Masonic Lodge No. 125


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Copy vio problems have been taken care of, and consesus is to keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Pond Creek Masonic Lodge No. 125

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable building. Sammy1339 (talk) 01:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  02:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article was not as clear about it as it might have been, but as the one reference indicates, this building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. See National Register of Historic Places listings in Grant County, Oklahoma and .  Note that the current text of the article appears to have been copied from the registration form; assuming this is in the public domain, it could still stand some editing for readability. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The property is on the NRHP (10000622), but NRHP nominations are not public domain. Articles have been deleted as copyvio. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, given that comment, I've deleted the (possibly) copied text, which was excessively detailed in any case. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, NRHP listings are notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Ymblanter. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. NRHP listing means automatic notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.