Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pong project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Pong project

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Dictionary definition, neologism, no sources, unlikely to be anything more. Transwiki to Wiktionary? h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NEO, no sources to show any use. The only thing Google's first 30 hits came up with is UrbanDictionary (and, of course, variations on the game Pong). Don't transwiki without sources. --Huon 17:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Huon. --Moonriddengirl 18:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a a neogolism or Dilbertism per h i s.Article appears to be a WP:POV fork from Project management. --Gavin Collins 21:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't seem to find any other information on this. Izzy007 Talk 00:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.