Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PonoMusic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pono (digital music service). Or the other way round as proposed below.  Sandstein  09:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

PonoMusic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Same subject as Pono (digital music service) Rathfelder (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect Article creator here - thanks for the ping . I think this may be better as a merge and redirect with Pono (digital music service), but the question is which one stays as the main article.  When I created this in 2014, the digital music service article was there, but not the company article, which this one was intended to be. There was a player, a service and a company, like with the iPod, iTunes and Apple.  The PonoPlayer article was created in January 2015 by, who appears inactive since May but I pinged him (her?) anyway. The service and player subsequently failed, but we want to keep a record of everything as part of the digital graveyard.  Whatever the consensus is, a merge and redirect will keep the separate editing history. Without going too much down memory lane, my initial instinct is to merge and redirect both PonoPlayer and Pono (digital music service) to PonoMusic (the company).  We could have a player and service section in the company article. That seems more elegant. I'll revisit when I have more time and after others have had time to chime in. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  15:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * If you are happy to merge them I'll withdraw this proposal. Rathfelder (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.