Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponte dei Bareteri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Been up 3 weeks & judging by sources listed notability is there, reluctant closing as Keep so will close as NC (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Ponte dei Bareteri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is unreferenced and doesn't make any claim of any significance. Compassionate727 (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 18:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 18:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 18:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. It is obvious that this stub needs expansion, but I see our basic notability criteria per WP:NGEO fulfilled. There are articles in several other Wikipedias, Google turns up with lots of hits, and it is covered in several books. One of them lists is as "bridge 26" of 100 Venecian bridges . Venipedia has a detailed description of it as well . With enough time at hands, I'm sure more in-deep sources can be turned up as well, so I think the article has potential to grow. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 01:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.