Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pontins Southport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Pontins. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Pontins Southport

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:ORG. Perhaps a merge, or just delete. the Pontins article seems to cover anything important and I don't know why we need an article about this specific park when the others don't even have their own! SarahStierch (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pontins. Some information from the history section (if I can be paired with a proper citation) would be constructive for the main article, but the rest is either promotional or fluff. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Others of the same company don't have separate articles, but some of those belonging to other companies do, and there's Articles for deletion/Duporth Holiday Village which appears to be for a similar type of place and the article was kept (although others have been deleted). Unless there's improvement in article content and sourcing, it should be redirected to Ainsdale - for precedent see Articles for deletion/Darwin Forest. Peter&#160;James (talk) 14:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The scale of these facilities is substantial. It may be that we should have articles on its sibling camps, and those of its rival Butlins.  Peterkingiron (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.