Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poonam Dubey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Poonam Dubey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR. Trivial unreliable tabloid-style coverage, created by account with pattern of copyvio, and in all likelihood improperly moved from draftspace to mainspace. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep A Bhojpuri cinema actress with coverage that passes WP:GNG due to these source. , Popular for her Item numbers, worked in at least 13 films. The majority target audience of Bhojpuri dont read English news, per Language WP:BIAS, the fact that there exists a few sources with detailed coverage, passes the notability test. -- D Big X ray   09:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I have now added 3 of these refs in the article.-- D Big X ray  10:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't provide failing GNG as a deletion rationale, but even so I don't think the provided sources pass GNG, much less the higher standard of NACTOR. I did look at the translated Hindi page (and will again since my laptop isn't translating it) but the other sources are a trivial mention in an awards post (that doesn't inherently provide notability), and a routine casting announcement. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 16:43, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per DBigXray and The Times of India does refer to her as well-known Bhojpuri actress.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Times of India referring to her as a "well-known actress" doesn't automatically guarantee notability. It's a trivial mention. The only way she even nears WP:NACTOR is if we decide that the interview cited above is reliable (and since we're discouraged from using interviews to establish BLP notability, I'm hinging towards no) under WP:NACTOR #2 (large fan base) or #3 "prolific contributions". The list of films is included at the end of an article that's not even about her, so I don't see it as being verifiable, not to mention the films are likely not notable. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 05:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * How does "Well Known" equate to "Trivial mention" ? Aren't they on the opposite sides of the notability ? Zee News and times of India are national WP:MAINSTREAM news outlets in India and not tabloids. WP:SIGCOV criteria is met here. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  19:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I was not clear .The subject does pass WP:NACTOR #2 and even maybe #1 and agree that WP:SIGCOV is meet by coverage by Zee News and times of India even without coverage from Bhojpuri newspapers.She is described by The Times of India as Bhojpuri cinema's superstar Poonam Dubey and has huge fan following and this states Bhojpuri siren Poonam Dubey celebrates 10 million views of Chana Jor Garam .Please note Bhojpuri is not Hindi and Bhojpuri Cinema is much smaller compared to Hindi cinema.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.