Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poopoloral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 04:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Poopoloral

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD from November 2013 read "Not a notable book per WP:NB. Not enough coverage by reliable sources, has won no awards, has not contributed to any major cultural events, is not the subject of instruction in schools, and author is not notable enough to automatically qualify all works as notable." I concur. Does not qualify under either WP:NB or WP:GNG. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  05:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.