Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop-Rap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was already redirected --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 20:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Pop-Rap
Delete NN neologism. Article makes little sense. the.crazy.russian  (T)   (C)   (E)  04:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC) WITHDRAWN  the.crazy.russian   (T)   (C)   (E)  22:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Not voting, observing that it does have a fair number of google hits. JoshuaZ 04:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand This is undenialy a recognised genre, but this article is quite clearly in need of de-suckifying. --Trafton 06:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I've been bold and redirected (the revision at that time being unmergeable) to pop-rap. I think this resolves the question. Samaritan 10:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you, didn't realize we had an article for that already. the.crazy.russian   (T)   (C)   (E)  20:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I use this phase with disheartening frequency and its meaning is quite clear.  I'm not sure if this is a legitimate genre of music, but it certainly exists.Tombride 01:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.