Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop art noir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Pop art noir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A WP:SPA article on an unreleased no-budget film, sourced only to user-contributed media (Soundcloud, Instagram, Youtube), on the last of which it is described as a student film. I had placed a WP:PROD with the rationale "No evidence that this unreleased film meet the notability criteria" but this was removed by another WP:SPA account. I am bringing this to AfD on the same rationale as the Prod. AllyD (talk) 08:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  10:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  10:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Well... I fixed his format problems, but I would tell this filmmaker that, at kindest, it is far TOO SOON for his film project to be covered by Wikipedia, and that in the future it might be only if or when it gets coverage by multiple reliable sources, and then send him to WP:NF, WP:RS, WP:NOTABOUTYOU and WP:PRIMER.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Clearly fails the notability guidelines anyways, but yeah, this is WP:TOOSOON as well. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, appears to be an amateur production of some sort. Fails notability guidelines.   PK  T (alk)  15:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.