Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Spebi  10:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Popkin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I originally nominated this for speedy per a1, but that was removed (and after looking at the article again I agree with the removal of the speedy tag), but it still should be deleted as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Also the term fails WP:N as the only reference I could find was an urban dictionary definition. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * delete agree with nom, it is a slang term and not encyclopedic. move to wiktionary if better sources can be found. Or redirect to The Dark Tower glossary as that is the only mention of it to be found. -- neon white  user page talk 21:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Only references to this particular definition of popkin (ie: not a name) that I could find via Google are, among others, SlangSite, a blog called The Daily Bitch, and the aforementioned UD entry. Clearly it is a relatively obscure slang term, a repository for which Wikipedia is not. Barring that, I can't imagine any logical expansion of the article as it stands. It deserves perhaps a passing mention in Sandwich.-Thatotherguy21 (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - the term was used in the Stephen King "Dark Tower" series (Book II) . I do not believe this adds much to notability; I'm just giving one more place where I've seen it. Tanthalas39 (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to sandwich toaster.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to sandwich and give passing mention there. Ford MF (talk) 01:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I just tagged this article it has no links to other articles. This article is not encyclopedic. Have also orphaned the article. Ohmpandya   ( Talk )  01:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.