Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popplio (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Popplio
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:POKEMON, many more notable Pokemon that do not have a page, easily the least notable article that is not a good article. Toketaa talk 20:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  20:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep the nominator's argument is inherently flawed. What is POKEMON meant to prove here? And even then, that is an essay, not a proper policy of any kind. Also "many more notable Pokemon" not having a page does not immediately rule out an article for being notable. Popplio, while I agree is one of the worse off articles among the Pokemon lineup, does have a pretty large amount of significant coverage discussing it in depth that many other characters in the series do not have. There is no rationale in this argument that communicates to me a valid reason to delete this article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, nominator makes no arguments based on policy or guidelines, and is merely WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST, which is considered an invalid argument for deletion. The nominator doesn't explain why it is "the least notable article," and their arguments about the quality of the article both lack foundation and are irrelevant to this discussion. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Idk how to close this page but yeah this should of been articles for creation for more notable pokemon, this is my first AFD so I will just remove the AFD notice on the article for now. Toketaa talk 20:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.