Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular 3D Techniques


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  21:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Popular 3D Techniques

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP is not a how-to or networking site. Is there a speedy cat that fits this? ukexpat (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   -- ukexpat (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Move This article is structured to move to a how-to. Even if how-tos were part of wikipedia's mission, which they are not, this topic could not be suitably handled in anything less than a full scale wikibook. I propose Move to Wikibooks and allow the subject to recieve full treatment there. Personally, for many topics, I think this would be a good resolution for a lot of discussions or article sections that are too in depth. HatlessAtless (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete or move. Perhaps I'm unsure about the mission of Wikibooks, but how does this fit into it?  I would think this sort of thing more suitable to wikiHow (and yeah, I'm aware that that's not part of Wikipedia).  Ford MF (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This could rapidly morph into a pretty good treatise on the state of the art of 3d rendering. However, WikiHow might also work. HatlessAtless (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - advertisement for non-notable website project; has been speedied before on this basis. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article is incomplete; the article only includes a few tips that make no logical sense; there are no sources or references whatsoever; there is no such experiment on the internet according to a Google search for 'popular 3d techniques'. In short, this article meets almost none of the criteria articles on Wikipedia have to meet, and therefore in my opinion should be deleted. gm_matthew (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom we are not a how-to guide. Sorry, there is not a speedy cat for this.   coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a how to. Anyone considering transwiking this might want to clear it with the target wiki first; it isn't vary useful as a how to. --Phirazo 01:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.