Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular Autonomy Movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Popular Autonomy Movement

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A totally unknown party; it seems that it is not possible to find any source on this party. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 15:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. The MAP did not achieve success in the election it participated in, but it was a real political party and, as such, it is definitely encyclopedic. Every little piece of political history deserves a space in Wikipedia. Articles like this (the nominator proposed a string of AfDs today) should be clearly improved, but not deleted. Of course, the passing of time makes difficult to find more sources and information in the web, but I will do my best to improve the article. I think it should be kept, anyway. At first glance I see proposed deletions as harmful and time-wasting exercises, but hopfully they could become opportunities for improving articles. --Checco (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The claim "definitely encyclopedic" is based on what? On the grounds that it simply existed? You know very well that the page cannot be improved. Your assessment of keeping this page is not about the relevance of the page itself, but a position based on the principle that everything can stay on wikipedia. But is not so.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete – There are no reliable third-party sources about this political movement. Actually I cannot even retrieve the archived copy of the only non-electoral source that is given. Also, it looks more like a political current inside other larger parties. Yakme (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not every group of people who come together to run a candidate are notable. We have decided political parties need clear coverage to justify an article, and that is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.