Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular Sergio Mendez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 08:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Popular Sergio Mendez

 * Delete NN person, unless being 226 years old is notable. Chris the speller 20:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, &#123;{db-bio}}, 226 years old isn't a claim of notability. --Interiot 21:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * CommentI would have speedied it, but thought that having his house on a tourist map might be taken as a claim of notability. But I'm with you 100%. Chris the speller 22:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Well, being 226 years certainly WOULD be notable. However, human beings do not live to 226, and if one did, it would be making worldwide headlines. wikipediatrix 21:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- Article is factually incorrect. Even if we assume the date is supposed to be 1879 instead of 1779, it's still not likely to be true. This reeks of a hoax. Reyk 22:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as silly vandalism. Living to 226 would be notable because it would be 100 years older than anyone else., However, lack of verification of his existence leads me to believe this is a hoax. Capitalistroadster 23:50, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - hoax. B.Wind 01:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete hoax and nn-bio. Stifle 00:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.