Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porn 2.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Porn 2.0

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be made-up neologism, and article is completely unencyclopedic. Delete. (But if kept, should be renamed to something less neologistic.) --Nlu (talk) 23:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Those Google News and Scholar hits on the term don't seem to be made up. Enough for me to think this passes the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The references, as far as I see, were as informal as the former references to "iCrime" — which we do not have an article for and shouldn't. --Nlu (talk) 15:13, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep There are lot or results for the term Porn2.0. It is an upcoming phenomenon and as the article claims, the name has been derived from Web2.0. There is not need of changing the article name. WarFox ( talk  &#124;  contribs) 05:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.