Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep -Greg Asche (talk) 03:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy

 * Delete- I've never heard of this movie. The Republican 23:37, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Orphaned AFD from 29 October - listing corrected. Eddie.willers 01:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd say delete, but we generally keep movies on here...and this IS a movie. It's on IMDB and everything.  Therefore, keep, but needs to be labeled as a stub. Devotchka 02:15, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the stub tag was a good idea. The jokes about "expanding" it practically write themselves. -Colin Kimbrell 03:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'd never heard of it either, but it seems to be a legitimate movie that's worthy of an entry.  -Colin Kimbrell 03:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real movie which I have actually seen in an actual theatre. flowersofnight 03:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree about marking it as a stub too. Knowledge Of Self  |  talk . 05:34, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Keep. Legitimate movie. Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If nothing else check Amazon. 23skidoo 06:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, real movie, as verified by the IMDB page. &mdash; J I P | Talk 11:37, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This actually got relatively extensive indie coverage as I recall. A legitimate flick. Marskell 15:35, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Movie and documentary information are useful encylopedia entries, and I see Wikipedia has thousands of movies already documented. Revised Edition 19:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Jeremy is, for better or worse, a unique star in the porn kingdom. The movie is legit.  If y'all will excuse me, now that I have supported anything Ron Jeremy, I feel the need to go poke my eyes out. Stu 20:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this was a good movie, I saw it in a real theater. Jessamyn 22:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep; unjustified nomination. MCB 00:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Turgidly strong keep. Almost a speedy - nomination does not really express a valid reason for deletion, as the average Wikipedian has not heard of every article-worthy mainstream movie that exists. BD2412  T 02:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. "I've never heard of this movie" is an odd reason to delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as a real movie with some degree of notoriety in the adult film community. Jtmichcock 21:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't tell me much...not encyclopedia quality. If not deleted it should atleast be merged with the Ron Jeremy article. Chooserr
 * Keep as I've seen the movie... well put together and has gotten some buzz... is on IMDB... etc. Entertaining movie too Nick Catalano (Talk) 23:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Nakamatj 19:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.