Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porngata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  Dei zio  talk 16:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Porngata

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable porn website, the article reads like an ad with an overabundance of external links. The presence of the "citation style" tag in the article as created makes me suspect it is a repost of a page previously deleted. FiggyBee 01:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:WEB. MER-C 02:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB and possible WP:SPAM as well. To that I'd also add that while Wikipedia is not censored, I find such extensive links to actual pornography sites to be in poor taste. Wintermut3 02:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Did some minor clean up, though I see no reason at all to keep this article. wtfunkymonkey 03:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete just another website. Atlantis Hawk  03:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Links to actual porn sites? Yes, Wikipedia, isn't censored, but this just takes it over the edge. I wonder how many other porn-related AfDs I'll see today.. Split Infinity (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Fails to assert notability, it should have db-web on it. PumeleonT 03:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Speedy Delete - I dont think this really even needs to be explained. Somitho 05:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, possibly even speedy delete due to lack of any assertion why this site is notable within the milieu of the billions of porn-related sites per WP:WEB. -- Kinu t /c  06:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * what's funny is that the article DISCUSSES it's non-notability. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 08:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, it's just begging for it! SkierRMH, 08:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (not a speedy, though). --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 12:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per Pumeleon. Danny Lilithborne 12:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.