Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornsak Songsaeng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I find the 'keep' commentators persuasive that the subject is notable. Post-AFD work is needed but that is a matter for subsequent editorial action. Just Chilling (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Pornsak Songsaeng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of importance, one link is inaccessible, one is database. Do not exist significant coverage from reliable sources. Viztor (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * And what do you see when you click on the word "books" above? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , I check the first source and it appears to be a list of singers of a style in Thailand, I'm not seeing significant coverage, though this require editors who speaks Thai to confirm. Viztor (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Remember that not everyone sees the same things in Google Books as you do. This is why a handwave in the direction of a search engine is not a source citation.  Uncle G (talk) 07:35, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * And this is why I asked a question rather than claim that I was providing a source citation. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The only valid rationale for deletion, "Do not exist significant coverage from reliable sources," is untrue. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article does include coverage although the machine translation doesn't render it well for me, but as  Phil Bridger pointed out above, a google book search has a first result which makes it pretty clear the subject is notable. -- Whpq (talk) 02:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Given that he is mentioned in English language books and other scholarly works -, and with the sources in Thai already given (I'm sure there are more sources, and there also appear to be additional sources under the spelling Pornsak Songsang), I think he should qualify under GNG. He also appears to have been in a film - . Hzh (talk) 00:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I read "He stared on stage in 1981, from he was esbelaited his music band ." The text of the contested article has obviously been constructed entirely uncontaminated by care and attention. -The Gnome (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * And that is a reason to either fix the article or tag it as a rough translation, which had already been done before this was nominated for deletion, rather than a reason to delete the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.