Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port City International University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MJ94 (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Port City International University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No context, although much time has been given to provide it. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Almost no content in the article, but according to the school's webite, the subject is a university that has been operating for a year and a half. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I would prefer that eager contributors not create articles like these until they have something to say about the subject, but it is a bona fide university, issuing BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, etc. degrees, authorized by the University Grants Commission (Bangladesh). At least one independent source proving that the institution exists has been added to the article, so keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Worldbruce (talk) 23:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Already 4 batches of MBA programs have successfully passed from Port City International University as of Spring 2015 Trimester. PCIU, is committed to achieve excellence in academics and is located in its own permanent state of the art campus in South Khulshi , Chittagong.              (User talk: Prof. Asif Karim)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.234.140.171 (talk) 00:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)  180.234.140.171 (talk) 00:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I would retract my nomination and push for a speedy close considering the sources added. I just wasn't as diligent as a prvious editor and maybe lacked the concern to find the proper articles. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.