Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Ryerse School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Port Ryerse School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable primary school. (if sourced, the racial integration thing MIGHT be notable) tedder (talk) 11:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 11:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand - Other people should find information about Port Ryerse School in newspaper or print form and source it into this article. GVnayR (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Even at that, though, they would still be required to show that Port Ryerse School is notable enough to receive coverage outside of Norfolk County, Ontario. Merge this and the articles that follow per above.  These aren't grouped in one nomination, so a boilerplate answer for this.  This and the nominations that follow appear to have been part of a project of about 50+ articles about Norfolk County, Ontario in Template:Norfolk County, Ontario and even an entire category called Category:Elementary schools in Norfolk County, Ontario.  Needless to say, there is not a right of entitlement for articles about all of the elementary schools in any locality.  If any of these are notable outside the immediate area, then a keep should be considered, but this seems to be unfamiliarity of Wikipedia's general rules of notability. Mandsford (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Racial integration of students in the late 19th century is sufficiently uncommon to consider the school pioneering. I'm calling it weak because the entire article is based on one source. -Mgm|(talk) 18:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - the racial integration issue confers notability. TerriersFan (talk) 00:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * keep if there's more information than just the pictureabout integration, or otherwise merge with the school district.o or other appropriate unit., not delete. Inappropriate nomination at odds with our standrd practice  DGG (talk) 09:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.