Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PortaWalk, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 11:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

PortaWalk, Inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Spam. Article created by an spa who repeatedly spams the company on the Wheelchair ramp page, removes the notability and refimprove tags from the article, and refuses to discuss, or to provide, reliable sources. AnyPerson (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * delete salt and otherwise nuke this emberassing advertising. Shouldn't this be speedy?Bali ultimate (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * A speedy deletion tag was removed - . AnyPerson (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam spammity spam. Editor has been uncooperative and ignores attempted guidance from other editors. All of the refs are general facts about the Americans with Disabilities Act - nothing about the company itself.  Graymornings (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G11 and A7. Why was speedy declined - there is not even a scintilla of notability, just gobs of spam thrown in for good measure. ukexpat (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - All references are to disability acts and nothing to do with the company. No claims of notability, seems like just advertising to me. Canterbury Tail   talk  02:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete — I am borderline in thinking that this is blatant spam FWIW. However, this is very well acting as a web page for a company, which is certainly not allowed. MuZemike 05:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: Any admin passing by, please snowball close and delete. – ukexpat (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment especially as the originating and majority contributor is now blanking the page. Canterbury Tail   talk  22:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.