Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PortableApps.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 01:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

PortableApps.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy deleted after having been knocked down to a tenth its size (a two-sentence stub); I undeleted and thought I'd bring it here for opinions. I really don't care which way or the other it goes. Shimgray | talk | 09:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - To me, seems just about notable enough. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 12:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep --Darrelljon 19:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Creates portable versions of well-known open-source programs. Has multiple mentions in major technology magazines, including Wired and PC Magazine. --Trekkie4christ 21:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Same as what Trekkie4Christ said. Haseo9999 18:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Agreed with Trekkie4Christ. I'm updating the page to add more information and to make it read less like an advertisement. Ryan McCue Let's have a chat 02:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.