Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable Chess Notation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mike V •  Talk  06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Portable Chess Notation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability concerns, unsourced. It's own webpage says it is still in beta. Note when looking for sources that this is not the same as the much better known Portable Game Notation.  Spinning Spark  18:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of the format actually being used, nor any source beyond the developer's website. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is an associated article Forsyth–Edwards Expanded Notation which I have also nominated for deletion.  Spinning Spark  11:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Use seems to be very limited. The only references are to the creator's website and the article seems to have been written by the creator.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG. Hard to find any information at all about it, even (other than the information that's here). --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  18:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per comments above. Cobblet (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.