Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable Island: Te no Hira no Resort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Consensus is that there are adequate sources and this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Portable Island: Te no Hira no Resort

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable video game. I've tried to scour WP:VG/S for sourcing, but the only in-depth coverage I found were GameSpot and IGN both covering the announce/reveal at a trade show (added to talk page). There was no coverage afterwards, and all other hits were database entries. Note that the game is in English sourcing as "Portable Resort" rather than what the article shows. Searching the japanese title turned up a database entry on Famitsu, but no actual news/articles. It seems neither English nor Japanese reliable sources that we currently have identified took real note of the game. -- ferret (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. -- ferret (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I was only able to find this in Archive.org, which is obviously not enough for notability. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Already found 2 SIGCOV in English here and here. According to this, Dengeki Playstation gave it a "B" score in Japanese press. I'm not sure if that comes with a review or not, but the IGN and Gamespot hands-on previews seal the deal for me that this game is notable. It's likely that it just needs a more indepth search of dead-tree sources to find even more coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmms. This is all still announcement coverage that appears tied to the trade show hands on to me. I'd really like to see at least one solid post-release commentary. -- ferret (talk) 13:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: With new advocates for Keeping this article, I see No Consensus right now. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think with what we have above it's enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep GameSpot, IGN, and GoPlay previews are enough that this gets over the GNG line. --Mika1h (talk) 14:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. What we have from above should be enough. But here's some more coverage from 2010 in Kotaku . (Note, Same author also wrote in 2006 in Bloomberg ) &mdash;siro&chi;o 07:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.