Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portakal Çiçeği Tower (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If Slater is opposed to the rationale of the keep !voters, I'll reopen the discussion; but seeing no real opposition to valid keep arguments, am closing this for now. Lourdes  02:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Portakal Çiçeği Tower
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well no expansion or RS added since the last AFD. Not seeing any real notability. Its been a year, more then enough time to make this worthy of keeping. Slatersteven (talk) 13:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Added more info from the TR wikipedia page, the building is a notable building most importantly because it is a record holder for tallest building in the city which is a major metropolis, in other words, Ankara, the capital of Turkey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2R0T2E3 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, although this would also qualify for "Speedy Keep" because there is no legitimate rationale in the deletion nomination. Quoting my own comments in last AFD " Because there should exist coverage in Turkish and/or English, because it is a very tall building, and per List of tallest buildings in Ankara it is the tallest building in Ankara".  And "Note, at worst this should be merged or redirected to its row in List of tallest buildings in Ankara;  it should not be outright deleted." and  "Actually, can this AFD be closed "Speedy Keep", because there is no valid deletion rationale in the nomination.  There is no assertion that wp:BEFORE has been attempted.  Articles are not required to include sources, in fact.  "I doubt this passes GNG" is not something worth others' time and effort to address, IMHO."  Also in the last AFD No such user stated "I researched a bit and there is some coverage about the building, which confirms the little data we have in the article, and it must have gained some attention being so tall and modern. Not speaking Turkish, it's hard for me to assess reliability and depth of this coverage, but then the nominator didn't seem to either."  This new AFD's nominator also appears to have done no other wp:BEFORE work, besides ignoring the sources provided in the last AFD. --Doncram (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.