Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porter/Brayton cycle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as obvious copyvio ~ trialsanderrors 07:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Porter/Brayton cycle

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There appears to be no such thing. Article created by user largely to link content from website. If anything merge with Brayton cycle. Nposs 05:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Some sort of syntax error going on here - the AfD should be for Porter/Brayton_cycle NOT Brayton cycle. Can someone help sort this out? Nposs 05:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yea, there is a mistake or syntax error being made. Brayton cycle itself is fine.  I think Nposs intends for Porter/Brayton cycle to show up.  We need an admin or experienced user to help us sort this out.  Either way I say delete Porter/Brayton cycle. Chupper 14:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete copyvio as well --Salix alba (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.