Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porter Flats Apartments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Early close under the snowball clause. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Porter Flats Apartments

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBUILD as not much information available online (this is all I could find with a Google search). The notability criterion states "Buildings...require significant in-depth courage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability". Aydoh8 (talk) 02:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, United States of America,  and Montana. Aydoh8 (talk) 02:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It's listed on the National Register of Historic Places, therefore notable. Jfire (talk) 04:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Clicking on the NRHP number in the infobox, will bring up the historical study that was done for the building. Long and rather extensive. Oaktree b (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Here, giving a 100 plus year history of the building. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. As Oaktree b already mentioned, the nomination form for the building has both an in-depth history and a list of references at the end. The reason buildings on the NRHP are considered notable is that the National Park Service requires that information in order to list a property, and their standards are higher than GNG. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 16:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep The National Register of Historic Places is a part of Wikipedia's projects. This includes listings on the state-county-city levels. Many of them are stubs. What matters with NRHP is that we get a sourced article on them - even if it's just a sentence or two to start the article. — Maile  (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.