Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portland and Western 1501


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Portland and Western Railroad. Redirecting as it's stated all of the relevant content has been Merged. Liz Read! Talk! 03:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Portland and Western 1501

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. No indication of notability in article. One article is from a possible RS and contains SIGCOV of the subject's paint scheme. Other sources are either SELFPUB or just lists that include the subject (or are both). ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Oregon. Pbritti (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅, even rather deep google search did not give me any sites that would satisfy RS. AriTheHorse 03:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of individual notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge (a summary of)( the parts that can be verified to Portland and Western Railroad. There is no evidence of independent notability, but equally there is no reason this cannot be included as part of the broader article per WP:PRESERVE. Thryduulf (talk) 13:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone the relevant content to the article in September, which saved me a couple minutes! Agree on the PRESERVE element, but it looks like there's really nothing else that can be merged. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * In which case we need to retain the edit history here for attribution purposes, a redirect is the best way to do this. Thryduulf (talk) 09:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Thryduulf, same as last AfD, if it's already been merged do you perhaps want to suggest a redirect? TarnishedPathtalk 10:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said directly above, if content has been merged we must keep a redirect for attribution purposes. A !vote to merge can be taken as automatic support for a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. No evidence of individual notability. TarnishedPathtalk 01:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough to warrant an article. It's not noteworthy at all. BigSneeze444 (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.