Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portobello FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Portobello FC

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Could not locate any reliable sources; sources currently referenced are either non-independent or self-published blogs, and a WP:BEFORE only turns up with similarly self-published sites (no indication of fact-checking etc). As a result, the subject fails the general notability guideline. eviolite  (talk)  02:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Kingdom.  eviolite   (talk)  02:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree doesn't meet notability requirements for WP:CLUB, scope is not national in scale. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - plays well below the level considered notable by WP:FOOTY and no evidence of in-depth coverage in reliable independent secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. If by any chance it gets kept, the article should be moved to Portobello F.C. to be consistent with all other English football club articles -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: not notable article. Found nothing usable in a search. --Bigneeerman (talk) 13:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete All coverage seems to be either from the club, related parties or self-published sources. No sign of detailed coverage in reliable, independent sources. Spike &#39;em (talk) 12:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any coverage. Nfitz (talk) 01:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - A club playing at this level is unlikely to have the sort of coverage or notability that would justify it having its own Wikipedia article and I can see nothing that would suggest that this club is an exception. Dunarc (talk) 22:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.