Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positionality

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Positionality
This appears to be a quote by a person whom I have not heard of. It might be vanity but in case it is something more I created this vfd. Falphin 00:05, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia is not a commonplace book. The concept seems another systematic post-Marxist concept, but I doubt it's a very widely used term, as it looks pretty bulky and imprecise.  (And let their gourds verily be blown when they realize that the post-colonial center is decentered and cannot exist in an objectives system, even in a materialist critique.) Geogre 01:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable term. JamesBurns 07:16, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism . --Edcolins 19:37, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .