Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive liberty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. "I don't get it" isn't a reason to delete, and this is clearly an important sociological concept. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 21:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Positive liberty
This article appears to be about nothing at all Salvor Hardin 20:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Strong Delete unless someone can rewrite it and turn it into something meaningful. 20:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep nonsensical nomination; referenced article by a few trusted Wikipedians, and for anyone wondering, the delete vote cast was an unsigned vote by the nominator himself. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 20:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is quite clear and it even has an external link illustrating that this is a valid subject. IrishGuy 20:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Positive and negative liberty are both very important concepts that we should have on Wikipedia. (Positive liberty is "freedom to [do something]" while negative liberty is "freedom from [having something done to you]"). — Cuivi é  nen  ( talk • contribs ) , Sunday, 7 May 2006 @ 21:10 UTC 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.